Wednesday, February 07, 2007

 

Parliamentary industry committee hang-ups

INDU CommitteeParliament's Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology (INDU) has been conducting an investigation into Deregulation in Telecommunications, in the wake of Minister Bernier's decision to proceed with cabinet's policy direction to the CRTC and its interventions into a few CRTC Decisions. There are a number of sessions taking place through the month of February.

In October, the INDU committee recommending the Minister to delay interventions to the CRTC until the Committee had a chance to conduct more studies.

Yesterday's National Post had an article about CRTC Vice-Chair Rick French appearing as a witness on Monday. Sheridan Scott, from the Competition Bureau also appeared. There is another meeting scheduled for this afternoon, with witnesses from the cable companies and CLEC community.

With news reports breaking about the government's position on Net Neutrality, it will be interesting to see if the Committee's agenda gets side tracked. I published my free-market viewpoint on the story last night. For a contrary view, see Michael Geist.

Playing politics in a minority government is delicate work. If there are to be legislative changes to give effect to the report of the Telecom Policy Review panel, we'll be watching for a compromise approach to working with the INDU parliamentary committee.

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

Comments:
As long as we see more competition in the Telecom market up here in Canada, I and other Canadians will be happy. As you've sad before Quebec is competitive, but that the exception that confirms the rule.
 
I was just looking at the makeup of the Inudstry Committee and the minutes of their meetings dealing with telecom deregulation that have been posted on the Committee's website. The are 12 full-time members: 4 Conservative, 4 Liberal, 2 BQ, 1 NDP and 1 Independent. When the issue of Bernier's actions came up at the meeting on January 29th a motion was put forward that "the Committee invite the Minister to explain as soon as possible his decision to disregard the motion adopted by the Committee on October 26, 2006; (and) that the Committee conduct an in-depth study of the issue of deregulating telecommunications; and that the Committee report back to the House". It passed with a vote of 6 in favour and 4 opposed. The 6 in favour were 3 Liberals, 2 BQ and 1 NDP. The 4 opposed were 3 Conservatives and 1 Independent. (The Chair is a Conservative and he doesn't vote unless there is a tie and there was one Liberal member absent). Before this motion was passed, a Conservative member tried to amend the motion by deleting all the words after "October 26, 2006". The motion to amend was defeated by a vote of 6 to 4, presumably with the 6 being made up of the same as the 6 above and same for the 4. The question I have is WHY WERE THE CONSERVATIVES OPPOSED TO THE COMMITTEE CONDUCTING AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF THE ISSUE OF DEREGULATING TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND REPORTING BACK TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS? DO THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE?
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?