Monday, November 17, 2008
The following is for mature audiences

They appear collected in a government document in a way that George Carlin could only dream about.

I was surprised by the explicit nature of the CRTC's narrative describing the programming that was the subject of the complaint.
In a previous life, when preparing regulatory submissions, a few of us would slip certain language into drafts of our filings. We were continually trying to see if our boss was actually concentrating on reviewing the draft. On one occasion, we actually thought that "bodacious" was going to slip by.
I wonder if someone in the Commission's decision writing group collected a $5 bet on whether this one would make it through final review!
I think the Commission may want to put its own warning from the CBSC on the top of this Decision. If I wanted to hear that kind of language at 11 am, I'd go back to working for my old boss!
Technorati Tags:
MuchMusic, CBSC, CRTC
Comments:
<< Home
Mark, I think anyone that reads a CRTC report should be mature enough to understand the context of these "profane" words.
If they did not spell out the words used then how would anyone reading the report know if Much Music in fact did anything wrong?
What amazing me about this CRTC report, is that the other six words listed are not allowed to be said during the day. Since when where these "swear" words?
Post a Comment
If they did not spell out the words used then how would anyone reading the report know if Much Music in fact did anything wrong?
What amazing me about this CRTC report, is that the other six words listed are not allowed to be said during the day. Since when where these "swear" words?
<< Home