Friday, May 16, 2008
How good is good enough?
Has anyone else noticed that phone calls just don't seem to be as good as they were 10-15 years ago?
I had a number of radio interviews in the wake of the recent tragic breakdown in communications that may have contributed to the death of a Calgary toddler. Many of the discussions surrounded the potential for compromise in 9-1-1 location information associated with nomadic VoIP.
With over-the-top VoIP, the phone line just cannot be as reliable as a traditional circuit switched phone service. It needs power and it needs the residential broadband service to be working and relatively clear of heavy congestion. For an emergency call to be routed properly, the user needs to actively keep their user profile up-to-date. Still, these compromises are made in exchange for a lower price tag and a number of valuable call management features.
We put up with dropped calls in exchange for mobility; we're willing to redial in exchange for overseas calling rates that look like domestic pricing. In general, I sense that we seem to tolerate a number of quality compromises these days on voice service in exchange for lower prices and other features.
It is unusual to see quality diminishing with the application of new technologies. Those pin-drop crystal clear advertisements seem to be a distant memory.
I had a number of radio interviews in the wake of the recent tragic breakdown in communications that may have contributed to the death of a Calgary toddler. Many of the discussions surrounded the potential for compromise in 9-1-1 location information associated with nomadic VoIP.
With over-the-top VoIP, the phone line just cannot be as reliable as a traditional circuit switched phone service. It needs power and it needs the residential broadband service to be working and relatively clear of heavy congestion. For an emergency call to be routed properly, the user needs to actively keep their user profile up-to-date. Still, these compromises are made in exchange for a lower price tag and a number of valuable call management features.
We put up with dropped calls in exchange for mobility; we're willing to redial in exchange for overseas calling rates that look like domestic pricing. In general, I sense that we seem to tolerate a number of quality compromises these days on voice service in exchange for lower prices and other features.
It is unusual to see quality diminishing with the application of new technologies. Those pin-drop crystal clear advertisements seem to be a distant memory.
Comments:
<< Home
My experience with the quality of Rogers Home Phone has not been good. Even with a dedicated network (it's not VOIP), I find the line quality erratic and falling short of my previous service with Bell.
In contrast, I had service with Videotron a few years ago. And while network reliability was an issue (the network went down a few times), the line was as clear as Bell and the signal stronger.
I abhor the quality of cell phones. It is a key reason why I keep my landline.
Post a Comment
In contrast, I had service with Videotron a few years ago. And while network reliability was an issue (the network went down a few times), the line was as clear as Bell and the signal stronger.
I abhor the quality of cell phones. It is a key reason why I keep my landline.
<< Home