Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Taking it to the limit

It seems to me that these caps are a necessary step in aligning revenues with costs, which will ultimately alleviate much of the need to arbitrarily apply network management to applications. But it is just the first of a number of steps.
I compared my recent downloading to some friends and neighbours and an trend emerged: many of the heavy downloaders report a marked reduction in January and February from previous months. Why? When asking their kids what is going on, the answer is uniformly: writers' strike. There haven't been new TV shows to download.
A caution to parents that when TV production gets back to normal, almost coinciding with real charges for exceeding download caps, you may want to watch the 'bit-meter' or risk some hefty charges.
It will be interesting to see the impact of the price increases for people exceeding their usage allowance. Paying for higher consumption may result in some people changing their patterns of usage; it will also lead to an appropriate alignment of revenue to capital drivers.
Technorati Tags:
Rogers, download caps
Comments:
<< Home
Some sort of cap system is definitely appropriate to align the cost with usage. However, monthly caps are irrelevant when the bandwidth is being throttled.
I have been under a cap system for several years now, and it forces me to be reasonable with the bandwidth I use. When Bell begins throttling 24/7, however, I will be unable to even hit my cap. This is pur anti-competitive behaviour.
Post a Comment
I have been under a cap system for several years now, and it forces me to be reasonable with the bandwidth I use. When Bell begins throttling 24/7, however, I will be unable to even hit my cap. This is pur anti-competitive behaviour.
<< Home