Tuesday, December 12, 2006

 

Are we ready for full telecom price competition?

CRTCYesterday's announcement to overturn the CRTC's local forbearance decision is expected to more speedily open full price competition for local phone services.

Included in the changes is a 120 day countdown timer for the CRTC to respond to applications for forbearance once the criteria are met. As Minister Bernier stated in his announcement:
About 60 percent of the Canadian population lives in regions that meet the competitive infrastructure test, including most major urban centres. For Canadians living in remote areas of the country where there is limited choice, our government will be there to ensure universal access to telecommunications services at a reasonable price.
As pre-condition, however, the major incumbents, Bell and TELUS, will still need to improve their performance on Quality of Service for facilities that are provided to their competitors. Reports are that the ILECs still have failing grades, even on the subset of metrics under the new rules; improvement on this requirement will result in better service for customers of all industry players.

In the meantime, restrictions on promotions are being lifted, as are the prohibitions associated with winbacks. Both of these should provide more immediate visible signs of competition for consumers. We'll continue to look at the implications of the impact of the relaxation of these rules in the coming days.

It is becoming clear that Competition Bureau chief Sheridan Scott will be taking on an increasingly important role for the telecom sector. Her experience at both the CRTC and Bell make her well suited for the task. She will be speaking at The Canadian Telecom Summit in June.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , ,

Comments:
I fail to see how this move improves the opportunity for competition; brings long term price value to Canadian consumers; and increases innovative new services for consumers. Having a facilities based presence in a given market does not ensure competitive success. A company can certainly make a capital investment into a market but then must out last the ILEC's price dropping to negative cost levels.

If the ILEC takes this approach the only gain is a short-term price war. Eventually, someone will blink and the market prices will rise. Again it becomes a game of patience and bleeding. And the incumbent with the millions in profits they enjoy from huge market share and high prices provide a formidable war chest.

The mainstream consumer ends up buying on price and staying with the old POTS systems and VoIP will be the victim.

This appears to be going the same way as the mobile market in Canada where we pay 60%+ more and have half the available technology options.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?